The purpose of this research was to developing of teamwork ability for students of industrial education faculty major electronic engineering. By study was to team work ability for students. This research was developing questionnaire team cohesiveness inventory and teamwork inventory by Thurstone. The target population of the study was students of Rajamangala University of Technology Pha Nakon Faculty Industiral Education Major Electronic Engineering. The representative sample of 19 students were proportionally and simple random sampling by draw lots methods. Data were collected by means of questionnaires and analyzed by descriptive statistics presenting in form of tables. The findings of the study were that students major Electronic Engineering have team cohesiveness or teamwork. As students have thinking qualities of positive. The developing of teamwork ability decisive. The portion teamwork have qualities more than half good and developing teamwork must aspect support and to rest assured. And then aspect cooperate and used contradict in good.

This survey research has a purpose to study the personality of students at the Mechanical Engineering Department Faculty of Industrial Education Rajamangkala University of Technology Phranakhon. The improvement of test questionnaire 16 PF (Sixteen Personality Test) of Raymond B. Cat Resort from the total of 108 students who using a tiered landscape sampling (Stratified Random Sampling). Students from Mechanical Engineering. Tools used in evaluation of research data using a questionnaire and data analysis methods. Calculate overall percentage of arithmetic mean (arithmetic mean) or median comparisons t-test and F -test of students personality areas. Research results can be summarized as follows. 1.Personality with a teacher of mechanical engineering students by age showed that all of the moderates. The average of the maximum a person is sincere and guileless disclosed. 2. Personality with a teacher of mechanial engineering students by age is found that the older students have different personality. and students over 27 years of age are not timid than courageous Students aged between 23-27 years. 3. Personality on a teachers student in mechanical engineering disciplines. Levels by an average score found students with diffcrent rate levels. It is apersonality who loves to collect dissociation. Different Found that students with grade lower than the2.00 level as people like humility. Dissociate more. Students with a grade between 2.01 to 2.99. 4.Personality on a teachers student in mechanical engineering disciplines. By class year study. Shows students learn in diflerent class years are. Personality is about people like humility and dissociate different. 5. Personality with a teacher of mechanical engineering students by class year to find a more different pair were found about a person who loves to collect. Dissociate it. Students who study in year 1 class who likes to collect. Dissociate more. Students studying in year 3rd but this year found the about understanding. Students learn in class at 1th year is higher than intellet. Students studying in year 3rd years.

In ability development research in the team work for the student of Industry Education Faculty Major Civil engineering. The objective of research is to know the problem and education guideline for student being sacrifice and public spirit. The student should know how to live pith society and can work in team under the limits of educational problem and guideline of ability research development of 18 students by using the in influencing factor to team work namely in individual difference factor the result of team work the cause of team work conflict the leadership the problem of member in team work the result of research is the students do not still give and importance to the work 50-61 percentages approximately.

This action research has a purpose to study the personality of students at the Industrial Engineering Department Faculty of Technical Education Rajamangkala University of Technology Phranakhon. By using the Peter Lauster personality test this research compares the students personality before and after taking suggestion test on personal development. The subject of test consists of 13 students selected purposive selection from students at the first group of B.S. Technical Education (5-year curriculum) on Industrial Engineering Major. The collecting-data instruments are the Peter Lauters objective test namely the self report inventory and the authors questionnaires with check-list method. The data are analyzed by using the percentage and arithmetic mean. The research results are listed as the following: 1. The studentspersonalities before taking suggestion test on personal development in middle and low level are approximaicly 62.44 (largest group) and 6.88 percent respectively totaling approximately 69.32 percent. 2. The result from the personality test : the rather low and low level of self confident measurement are totally 76.91 percent. 3. After taking the suggestion test on personal development the good level is approximately 57.85 percent increasing about 27.18 percent relative to the same level before taking the suggestion test. On the other hand the low level is approximately 0.43 percent decreaing about 94.47 pecent relative to the same level before taking the suggestion test. 4. The findings from the interview and observation show that after taking suggestion test on personal development the most students not only improve their overall personalities but also build their self-confident as well as increase their well-adkist personalties resulting in the enhancement of their self-esteem.

The purpose of the study were to survey the academic staffs self-esteem on the expertise in eight academic disciplines specified as course syllabus technical teaching method educational measurement and evaluation teaching materials and teaching aids research and development knowledge of technical skill student advising and extension services. In addition the study was also to activity investigate the need for development with the suggestion of guideline for conducting the development program. The target population of the study were 479 academic staffs Rajamangala University of Technology in 9 faculty. The representative samples of 214 academic staffs were proportionally and randomly selected and samples size by Krejcie & Morgan. Data were collected by means of questionnaires and analyzed by descriptive statistics presenting in form of tables. The findings of the study were that all academic staffs rated at the high level in technical teaching method course syllabus knowledge of technical skill and student advising. Whereas the least was on research and development and the rest of the 4 areas were rated as fair by all. And academic staffs needs for academic development activities were training and workshop respectively. Academic staffs suggested that the development program should be specially organized depending on specific need or it could be a year planned one. However the strategy most recommended was the cooperation with private industry followed by the in house training program for at lest once per semester at the school break session.