The objectives of this research were to study and to compare the information literacy level of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon undergraduate students by dividing into faculties and experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. The samples were undergraduate students in 9 faculties who were studying in second semester of academic year 2009. The 460 samples were taken a random sample by faculties’ stratification. The data were collected by information literacy test and mark record form which were four - level rating scale questions. The results were analyzed by percentage average value standard deviation F-test and t-test

The objectives of this research were to study and to compare the information literacy level of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon undergraduate students by dividing into faculties and experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. The samples were undergraduate students in 9 faculties who were studying in second semester of academic year 2009. The 460 samples were taken a random sample by faculties’ stratification. The data were collected by information literacy test and mark record form which were four - level rating scale questions. The results were analyzed by percentage average value standard deviation F-test and t-test The results were as follows: 1. Most of all students had medium information literacy level. For consideration of each aspect students had ability in every aspect at medium level. The highest ability of students was to access the needed information effectively and efficiently the next were the ability to determine the extent of information needed ; to evaluate information and its sources critically and to incorporate selected information into their knowledge bases. 2. Students that learnt in different faculties had different information literacy with statistically significant level at .01. Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher information literacy level than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Science and Technology’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. For consideration of each aspect it showed that every aspect was different with statistically significant level at .01.2.1 For the ability of determining the extent of information needed it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of determining the extent of information needed than Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. 2.2 For the ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. 2.3 For the ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students and Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students. 2.4 For the ability of using information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose It showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of using information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students. 2.5 For the ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Engineering’s students.3. The students who had different experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects they had different information literacy with statistically significant level at .01. The students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had higher information literacy than the students who had no experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. For consideration of each aspect it showed that the students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had different the ability of determining the extent of information needed; the ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently; the ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base; the ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally with statistically significant level at .01. For the ability of using information efficiently in order to reach the objective was different with statistically significant level at .05 by means of the students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had higher information literacy than the students who had no experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects in every aspect.

The objectives of this research are to study 1) the acceptance level of information and communication technology (ICT) characters environment supporting ICT use lecturers attitude in ICT use and ICT use in teaching 2) the relation between ICT use in teaching and lecturers characteristics and 3) the relation between ICT use in teaching of lecturers and acceptance in characteristic of ICT environment which support ICT use and lecturers attitude in ICT use in teaching. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches are applied by using questionnaire and in-depth interview for data collection. The research sample is 220 lecturers from 9 faculties of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Descriptive and inference statistics are used; percentage arithmetic mean standard deviation Pearson correlation and mUltiple regression analysis with Enter technique. The findings are; 1.The high acceptance level in characteristics of ICT and lecturers attitude in ICT use in teaching aspects (x = 3.99 3.64) low score for environment supporting ICT use (x ::::: 2.46) and medium score of ICT use in teaching of lecturers (x ::::: 3.27). 2.Lecturers ICT use in teaching is related to 3 lecturers characteristics. It is positively related to computer ownership and the faculty affiliated and negatively related to experience in teaching. 3.Lecturers ICT use in teaching are related to acceptance in characteristics of ICT environment which support ICT use and lecturers attitude in ICT use in teaching. 4.Recommendations to Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon in improving and development of ICT use are; (-3) 4.1 open ended questionnaire; 1) prepare sufficient leT equipments for lecturers 2) setting computers and projectors in every classroom and 3) training ICT uses application in teaching for lecturers. 4.2 in-depth interview; 1) environment supporting aspect; increase sufficient computers equipments computer networks and improve their efficiency and increase budget for ICT 2) characteristic perceiving and attitude to ICT use aspect; increase knowledge in literature copy right act to lecturers and 3) leT use in teaching aspect; training lecturers to get more knowledge and skill in ICT use electronic media producing and information searching from websites by internet.

The purposes of this research were to study information technology (IT) management students competency in using IT comparative knowledge skill and integration of students and influence of management for learning development of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhons students. Quantitative method and survey research were used. The population of the study were bachelor degree level students and the number of sample was 380. The research instrument was a five point Likert scale questionnaire. Frequency percentage means standard deviation t-test ANOVA and simple regression analysis were used for analysis by using SPSS for windows program. Four aspects of IT management were studied ; 1) place and climate 2) quantity and quality 3) personnel and 4) services. All aspects were ranked at the middle level on the average. Number of computers and equipment connections enthusiasm for service IT public relation in services and students assistant in IT using study tour for IT outside campus and number of computers in library were low in scores. Students competency in using IT for learning development in three aspects (knowledge skill and integration) were at middle level. Some items were low in scores; website and homepage creating e-book and e-journal and useful task project distribution. The study on IT competency of students learning development in knowledge and skill showed that males were higher than females and computer owners and higher experience students were higher competency. The students in different faculties had different competency in using IT such as students of engineering faculty had higher competency than students of architect and design and home economics. The factors that influenced students learning development in management aspects were ; connection equipments in computer laboratory and self-access temperature available of teaching aids and CD-ROM multimedia in teaching for staff. Personnel aspect found to influence students learning development were human relations support for internet use and staffs ability in using teaching aids and multimedia. For service aspect service time in self-access room wireless internet service and IT training out of class for students was found to have influence on students learning development.