Bread is a bakery product with low moisture content. It have a hard and sticky texture that cause difficult to eat. Therefore in the present study the effect of gelatinized starch (wheat corn rice tapioca and glutinous starch) to improve of bread quality was determined. Starch were gelatinized and added as bread ingredients. Gelatinized starch influenced the quality of bread. The bread obtained gelatinized starch with high specific volume and moisture content but low density (p≤0.05). Sensory evaluation showed that the bread which contained from gelatinized tapioca starch obtained highest score especially texture and overall acceptance from the panelists. Tapioca gel has been used as texture improving agent in bead. The effect of tapioca gel on the quality of bread were determined. The tapioca gel (0 20 30 40 and 50% of wheat starch) was used in the formulation of the bread. Increasing tapioca gel improved specific volume moisture content density and sensory quality (p≤0.05); however these quality were deteriorated as add tapioca gel up to 50% (p≤0.05).

The objective of this research were 1) Determination of anthocyanin in riceberry rice bran has been 1195.60 mg/L 2) To investigate the suitable amount of riceberry rice bran added into bread. Sensory evaluation revealed that the bread added 10% riceberry rice bran was similar to the bread added 30% riceberry rice bran they received the highest likability scores in terms of in the appearance color odor and taste. However their softness and overall preferences were significantly different (p<0.05). Water activity (aw) of bread added riceberry rice bran at various concentrations 10 20 and 40% were not significantly different (p>0.05) but it sighificantly decreased in bread added 30% riceberry rice bran. For texture analysis the handness of bread added 10-30% riceberry rice bran were not significance increased however the hardness of bread with 40% riceberry rice bran was significantly higher then the bread with the addition of 10%. The color of bread addition with four levels of riceberry rice bran were significantly different (p<0.05). Riceberry rice bran added into the bread reduced the brightness value reduce obesity in bread that has been recognized as having a strong flavor. The bread added 30% riceberry rice bran has been accepted dark purple fragrant rice bran. The outer skin of the bread is slightly dry and sweet taste 3) The shelf life of riceberry rice bran in bread can be stored for 3 days.

The purpose of the study is to study 3 formula basic formula Sweet bread. To study the amount of Riceberry flour to replace Wheat flour in sweet bead in 4 levels : 0% 15% 25% and 35% of wheat flour weight and to study the amount of Squash butternut added Riceberry sweet bread in 4 levels : 0% 5% 15% and 20% of all compound. The experiment is analyzed by Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to evaluate sensory quality of appearance color flavor taste texture (soft) and overall preference. The savory evaluation is tested by 9-Point Hedonic scale and evaluated by 80 subjects. It is analyzed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Least Significant Difference (LSD) and Duncan’s New Multiple Range test (DMRT). The results of the study Riceberry flour to replace Wheat flour in sweet bead that most of the gourmets like the level of 25% with the average in appearance color flavor taste texture (soft) and overall preference moderate levels. When analysis in variance and statistical difference were found that satisfaction in all various respects were significantly different at a confidence level of 95%. The result of the study the amount of Squash butternut added Riceberry sweet bread that most of the gourmets like the level of 5% with the average in appearance flavor taste and overall preference moderate levels. When analysis in variance and statistical difference were found that satisfaction in all various respects were significantly different at a confidence level of 95%.

The purpose of this study is basic recipes of Breadsticks and to study the amount Riceberry Flour to Substitute Replace Wheat Flour in Breadsticks. There were 4 levels of 0% 20% 30% and40% Randomized Complete Black Design ( RCBD) Breadsticks quality was assessed by the favorableness of Appearance color order test texture ( crispy) and overall Score using 9-Point Hedonic Scale. Breadsticks quality was evaluated by 40 gourmets Redue repeatedly tried 2. Analysis of Variance ( ANOVA) and Least significant Difference and Duncans New Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The results found that most of the gourmets. Like the level of 20%. The are range preferences of Breadsticks Appearance test texture (crispy) and overall Score arein the high level and Color and order. Score are in the moderate level showed that Appearance color order test texture ( crispy) and overall preference is Statistically Significant at the 0.05.

The objectives of this research were to study: 1) basic sweet bread recipe; 2) proper amount of ripe palm fruit pulp; 3) proper amount of yeast; 4) product acceptance; and 5) shelf life. A process of sweet bread production was studied with ripe palm fruit pulp supplement and the sweet bread formula was selected by acceptance through sensory test. Four levels of amount ripe palm fruit pulp studied were 15 20 25 and 30 percent of total ingredient weight. Four amounts of yeast were 0.6 1.0 1.4 and 1.8 percent of flour weight. Acceptance of sweet bread with ripe palm fruit pulp supplement was assessed for satisfaction in color smell flavor texture (smoothness) and overall satisfaction by 100 evaluators using hedonic consumer test. A 7-day shelf life was studied. Results showed that: 1) The second formula was the most accepted in color flavor and texture; 2) The proper amount of ripe palm fruit pulp was 15 percent; 3) The proper amount of yeast was 1.8 percent; 4) The product was accepted for 92 percent in color 94 percent in odor 86 percent in flavor 81 percent in texture and 88.6 percent in overall acceptance; and 5) Shelf life of the product was 3 days in room temperature by community product standard for bread with filling.