The purpose to this research was to assessment the graduate Diploma Program of Teaching Profession at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon Faculty of Industrial Education of the curriculum used. Research population consisted of graduate students diploma degree graduate their superiors and instructors. Simple random sampling gave the sample size of 549 people were selected from purposive sampling. The research tools were a questionnaire and a focus group discussion recording form. Data analysis employed basic statistics of frequency mean and percentage including content analysis for qualitative data. The findings of this research were as follows: 1) Primary components of the curriculum were suitable at high level. 2) Course structure and content was suitable at high level. 3) Characteristics of lecturers were suitable at high level.4) Instructional and evaluation activities were suitable at high level. 5) Factors contributing to the teaching of the course were also found suitable at high level. On the contrary Journals related to inadequate service and problems of withdrawal teaching materials. However the curriculum development should be updated to suit the needs of society and science is always developing.

This paper is a survey research. The objective is to study the factors of Social Adjustment of Technical Education Faculty Students B.S. of Technical Education (5 years curriculum) Faculty of the industrial education Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The random sampling is conducted within the full-time students from 3 majors. The random sampling technique in this paper is derived from Krehbiel-Morgan table. The total number of sample is 167 students. Research Methodology This paper uses the survey method to collect the data. The data analysis process is based on the average percentage value of standard deviation and t-test F-test techniques. The research results can be summarized as follows: 1. Students with different genders have overall social adjustment ability indifferently. 2. Students with different ages have overall social adjustment indifferently. This implies that age is not a factor in social adjustment. 3. Students who graduated from different curriculum have overall social adjustment ability differently. The students who graduated from vocational-qualification curriculum have overall social adjustment ability higher than students who graduated from academic-qualification curriculum. In specific aspect of social adjustment to classmate the result is also the same. 4. Students with different sequence of birth have overall social adjustment ability indifferently. 5. Students with different family status in society have overall social adjustment ability indifferently. 6. Students with their parents in different occupation have overall social adjustment ability indifferently. 7. Students with different average-income-per-month families have overall social adjustment ability indifferently. However in specific aspect of social adjustment to general person the students with higher average-income-per-month families have social adjustment ability better than the students with lower average-income-per-month families. 8. Students with different family characteristics have overall social adjustment ability differently. The students with large family have overall social adjustment ability higher than students with small family.

The purpose of this research was to developing of teamwork ability for students of industrial education faculty major electronic engineering. By study was to team work ability for students. This research was developing questionnaire team cohesiveness inventory and teamwork inventory by Thurstone. The target population of the study was students of Rajamangala University of Technology Pha Nakon Faculty Industiral Education Major Electronic Engineering. The representative sample of 19 students were proportionally and simple random sampling by draw lots methods. Data were collected by means of questionnaires and analyzed by descriptive statistics presenting in form of tables. The findings of the study were that students major Electronic Engineering have team cohesiveness or teamwork. As students have thinking qualities of positive. The developing of teamwork ability decisive. The portion teamwork have qualities more than half good and developing teamwork must aspect support and to rest assured. And then aspect cooperate and used contradict in good.

In ability development research in the team work for the student of Industry Education Faculty Major Civil engineering. The objective of research is to know the problem and education guideline for student being sacrifice and public spirit. The student should know how to live pith society and can work in team under the limits of educational problem and guideline of ability research development of 18 students by using the in influencing factor to team work namely in individual difference factor the result of team work the cause of team work conflict the leadership the problem of member in team work the result of research is the students do not still give and importance to the work 50-61 percentages approximately.