The purpose of this research is to provide the understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) compare to the expectation of public in CSR and find the factors of CSR activities in eight corporate industries. The samples are 400 publics in Bangkok who answer the closed end questionnaires. A quantitative analysis by percentage mean compare-mean and multiple regression that are on significant 95 percentages. The finding are three parts at first the most understanding in CSR is the social and culture dimension (mean=4.467). Second some differences geographical samples determine the expectation in CSR. Third the factors to describe CSR of eight corporate industries are as follows this 1) agriculture and food industry is the social and culture dimension 2) consumption and consume industry is the voluntariness dimension 3) financial industry is the social and culture dimension 4) automobile and materials industry is the stakeholder dimension 5) immovable property industry is the social and culture dimension 6) natural resources industry is social and culture dimension 7) service industry is environmental dimension and 8) technological industry is the stakeholder dimension. Further more the corporate in every industrial should be concern CSR on maximize profit to nation public and corporate.

Today it found out that many organizations in Thailand did not pay attention in the importance of doing CSR activities due to those activities are in need of budget requirement. In other word it increases the company burden while the society will be the only party who receive the benefits. There is increasing pressure to dress up CSR as a business discipline and to deliver business results. Such philanthropic activities like donating money to local charities will be mainly carried out in broad spectrum without any demand from society at all. As a result it comes the concept of Creating Shared Value (CSV) which is widely accepted ideal of pursuing “shared value” by creating CSR activities with business value in ways that also create value for society sustainability. The objectives of this article is to study about CSV in details from various sources of academic documents while to review all relevant literatures in order to easily understand the concept of CSV. It combines all kind of knowledge about CSV with explanations in many point of views with comparison and the differences between CSR and CSV for proper understanding. Our article comes with the active engagement of the company leader in CSV initiatives into general practice by integrating CSV with their business vision and strategies including to align with the company’ s purpose and values. A properly implemented CSV concept can bring along a variety of competitive advantages by their resources as well as internal expertise to enhance employees efficiency creativity and reinforcement their employees potential to become the powerful tool in creating innovative business model in order to benefit to society improvement. In related to the above mentioned useful experience from CSV activity operating by one of Thai company has been shared with guidance for other companies those like to develop and across in the business model successfully.

The present research was aimed at systematic surveys and analyses of The Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility that affects to attitude about Siam Cement Group image of people in Bangkok. 440 people were statistically analyzed selected using by frequency percentages arithmetic mean standard deviations. As the result of research: (1) The most respondents were female aged between 18–30 year old graduated bachelor degree and were employed by private companies income between 10001 - 30000 baht. (2) The overall perception toward the management to social responsibilities SCG was also at a highest level. People received information through Television and Radio. (3) The overall attitude toward the management to attitude of about SCG image of people were in high agree with. (4) The level of perception toward the corporate social responsibility in Environment Social and Community at .05 level of significance.