This research aims to study and compare the level of expectations asked parents on the quality of the student division of Fashion Merchandising Technology. Faculty of Home Economics Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon in three aspects: Knowledge and professional skills attitudes moral and appropriate of value and social responsibility participation and adaptation in society happily. The population is parents of students at the Fashion Merchandising Technology 1-4 year 2557 was used questionnaire prepared. Data were analyzed by using percentage mean standard deviation and the T-Test F-Test. The results showed that the highly prospective parents on the quality of student in the Division of Fashion Merchandising Technology Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon These three aspects are average in high level (3.93). And expectations of the parents on the quality of the students Classified by personal background of parents was found. Did not differ significantly at 0.05

The research studies self-discipline behaviour of business administration student of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon Pha Nakorn. There are 2 main points in objective: 1) To study the power to predict student’s self-discipline behaviour by psychological characteristic psycho-situational characteristic and social characteristic in collected group and subgroups. 2) To examine the interaction between psychological characteristic psycho-situational characteristic and social characteristic that relates to self-discipline behaviour in collected group and subgroups. The survey of 400 undergraduates was conducted to assess self-discipline behaviour of students. Moreover there are 6 independent variables in this research including 2 variables of psychological characteristic (future orientation and self-control and achievement motivation) 2 psycho-situational characteristic variables (perceived self-efficacy and attitude toward self-discipline behaviour and 2 variables of social characteristic (good role model from family and supportive rearing while the dependent variable is self-discipline behaviour. Basic statistics multiple regression analysis and two-way ANOVA were used to analyse. All of the analysis was also used in both collected group and subgroup according to socio-demographic characteristic. The results of this research are as follow: 1. 6 variables in term of psychological characteristic psycho-situational characteristic and social characteristic can predict self-discipline behaviour in collected group accounting for 59.5 per cent while subgroups are between 32.1 to 44.8 per cent. The most prediction is female group. Furthermore the most significant predicting factor is attitude toward self-discipline behaviour which is in equation in collected group and subgroups and it is the first significant predicting factor in collected group and male group as well as the student group who study in first and second years in bachelor’s degree. 2. Students who have high level of future orientation and self-control and good role model from family will have great self-discipline behaviour. In fact it is found that future orientation and self-control and good role model from family disconnect with student’s self-discipline behaviour at the level of significance of 0.05. However when analysing each independent variable self-discipline behaviour varies with future orientation and self-control. It appears on collected group and 4 subgroups which consist of male group female group the first and second year undergraduate group and the third and fourth year undergraduate group. In addition good role model from family influences self-discipline behaviour that can be found in collected group and 4 subgroups such as male group female group the first and second year undergraduate group and the third and fourth year undergraduate group. 3. The students who have high achievement motivation and supportive rearing are estimated to have great self-discipline behaviour. Whereas it is apparent that achievement motivation and supportive rearing do not interact with self-discipline behaviour at the level of significance of 0.05. On the contrary when considering each independent variable achievement motivation affects self-discipline behaviour in collected group and subgroups (male group female group the first and second year undergraduate group and the third and fourth year undergraduate group). At the same time self-discipline behaviour is also determined by supportive rearing that presents in both of collected group and subgroups which include male group female group the first and second year undergraduate group and the third and fourth year undergraduate group.

This survey research aimed to study ethics of information uses and ethical perception of Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Sample group that stratified by fields was 309 undergraduates studying in academic year 2015 from Faculty of Liberal Arts Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The data collecting tool was questionnaire about ethics of information uses of Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The statistic analysis used percentage and standard deviation. The results showed that : 1. Students had totally ethics of information uses in medium level. Its considered each aspect found that students had the most of ethics of information uses in aspect of information dissemination followed by an aspect of information property and information accessibility. 2. Students had totally ethics of information uses in aspect of information accessibility in medium level. Its considered each item found that the most item that students had ethics was that they usually used their user ID and their passwords to log in the university’s internet system followed by they usually used their user ID and their passwords into information searching system in databases. 3. Students had totally ethics of information uses in aspect of information property in medium level. Its considered each item found that the most item that students had ethics was that if they utilized pictures from books journals newspapers to compose their report or to publicize they would cite to sources of pictures. And if they utilized articles from journals newspapers web sites to content analysis as case study they would cite to sources of content. 4. Students had totally ethics of information uses in aspect of information dissemination in good level. Its considered each item found that the most item that students had ethics they usually avoided to use statement or pictures that was contrary to law and social good moral for example; pictures of rove false statement etc. followed by students usually avoided to use statement or picture that showed violation of privacy rights for example ; defamation statement photomontage etc. 5. Students had the ethical perception involved to information uses in medium level. Its considered each item found that the most item that students had ethical perception was that the utilization of others academic papers for being parts of its own study they had to cite sources every time otherwise its considered that was illegal and unethical. Followed by the utilization of other words or other interviews to compose its own report or its own presentations they had to be allowed otherwise its considered that was copyright infringement.

The purposes of this research were (1) to study and (2) to rank the needs of RMUTP environment management on undergraduate students’ learning development as well as (3) to present a proposed guideline to improve RMUTP environment. 343 students enrolling in the first semester of the academic year 2015 were selected with simple random sampling. The research tool was questionnaire. The data were analyzed through percentage (%) mean ( ) standard deviation (S.D) t-test modified priority needs index: PNI modified and content analysis. The results demonstrated that: (1) The overall mean scores of the reality and expectation of RMUTP environment on students’ learning are statistically different at 0.01. (2) The physical environment needs for supporting students’ quality of life was ranked the first. The second was university facilities to enhance their learning and the third was help and information service. The curriculum management was ranked the fourth. The last one was instructors. (3) A students’ proposed guideline: 3.1 As for physical environment needs for supporting students’ quality of life the highest was more relaxing space. 3.2 As for university facilities to enhance their learning the highest was that learning equipments should be adequate for them. 3.3 As for help and information service public relation and university information for students should be improved at a high level. 3.4 As for curriculum management the study suggested students’ needs for curriculum development to meet current employment demand and to implement effectively at the workplaces. 3.5 As for instructors the highest rank was that instructors ought to understand and listen to students’ needs. They should let students express their opinions.

The survey research aimed to: 1) study the behaviors of self-directed learning; 2) compare levels of self-directed learning behaviors which is classified by personal status; and 3) study guidelines for self-directed learning. The subject obtained through stratified random sampling consisted of 319 first-fourth year undergraduates of the Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The research tool was a questionnaire. The frequency percentage mean standard deviation t-test and ANOVA were used for data analysis and hypothesis testing. The results were as follows: 1. The overall level of students’ behaviors for self-directed learning was high (X = 3.74; S.D.= 0.74) that were self-evaluation competency (X = 3.89; S.D.= 0.74) self-management competency (X = 3.75; S.D.=0.76) self-learning competency (X = 3.74; S.D.=0.70) self-searching competency (X = 3.72; S.D.=0.72) and characteristics of self-directed learners (X = 3.59; S.D.=0.77) respectively. 2. There was no difference of self-directed learning behaviors when genders and educational levels were considered. In contrast there were statistically significant difference at 0.05 when academic performance was considered. 3. The overall level of students’ opinions on guidelines for self-directed learning was high (X = 3.51;S.D.= 0.85) self-directed was academic matter (X = 3.74; S.D.=0.76) physical matter (X = 3.41 ; S.D.=0.93) management (X = 3.40; S.D.=0.87) respectively.