What-If Analysis is a simply uncomplicated hazard indication method. Its analysis method is highly flexible by brainstorming of analytical team that have good knowledge and experiences for thinking about questions regarding undesirable events that might occur and cause severe incidents or accidents by the asking questions begin with “What If…..?” or “What would happen if…?”. This method can be used for any time and it will get highest benefits if it is used during the design process or improvement of existing systems because all systems will be improved to be more safety at early stage. Furthermore it is also suitable to identify hazards from dynamic activities such as car driving and cleaning etc. What-If Analysis includes 4 steps: establishing cope of questions setting analytical team studying information and related documentation establishing questions and finding effects. Analytical team should include at least landlord design engineer safety officer technician and maintenance technician and if this analysis method is used for only identifying hazard technically and if should beware of overlooking critical problems occurred from many related incidents

This research is obviously studied the problems and obstacles in accepting the students for training according to the workplaces notions through the areas of training management training format training students qualifications and training students knowledge. The subjects for this research were randomly selected from varipus firms which accepted 115 third year undergraduated students in training. Questionnaires were statistically analyses by Percentage Mean and Standard Deviation. The findings of this research were as follow :1. In the training management aspect the workplaces were not able to cooperate with school for preparatory training and they did not know the major objectives of the training course syllabus moreover the firms did not have specific positions for training students. 2. Through the training format the observers who checked training students performances did not cooperate with the workplaces and the training students who themselves directly contacted to workplaces were not accepted. Furthermore there was no continuity of scattering training students on workplaces. 3. Training students qualifications training students were lack of mature selfconfidence and thoughtful ideas in working and solving problems. 4. Training students knowledge training students were not qualified in their vocational skillsEnglish and Thai communications task analyZing and task planning for their training job.

This research is an exploring research to be connected with the main purpose of learning about the satisfactions in working as other sides for supporting personal consists of supporting for government officers supporting for government staffs university staffs permanent employees and temporary employees in total 635 people. There are only 360 people of samples from the total as mentioned to be analyzed the factors and other satisfactions the result of this research is the level of surrounding factors in working as showing the average rate for all over as the normal level. In comparing with the personal factor and satisfaction were found that Male are much more than Female about satisfaction in all factors mentioned. And also single government staff there is most of satisfying than married and divorced status. Additionally the level of satisfaction will be reduced respectively as referring with ages type of working opportunity colleague and facilities but the satisfaction of reward will be much more which is depended on ages. Moreover the experienced staff will be much satisfied as follows: Type of working Reward Opportunity and Facilities but another side to be less satisfied are Colleague. However the responsibility of members in their family will be less satisfied almost all sides. Another thing the position is the most of satisfying colleague & facilities are next and reward & opportunity to be promoted as the last one. Moreover chief executive position satisfies more than head of department and operation respectively. Noise temperature dust smell air flow and colleague are the surrounding factors to be reflected with the satisfactions.

The purposes of this research were to investigate quality of work life for lecturers in Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon each of six aspects : economics healthy working condition competency development advancement relationship with peers and total life space ; and to compare the quality of work life in overall and each of six aspects among lecturers with different gender marital status work experience educational level and family income. The sample of the study consisted of 228 instructors in Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon in the academic year 2008. The instrument used for collecting data was a four - rating scale questionnaire with 62 items. Arithmetic mean standard deviation t - test one-way analysis of variance and Scheffes method were utilized for dada analysis. The results of the study indicated that: 1. The quality of work life for lecturers in Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon in overall and each of six aspects was an the high level. 2. There was no significant difference in overall and each of six aspects of quality of work life between male and female lecturers. 3. There was no significant difference in overall and each of six aspects of quality of work life for lecturers with different marital status. 4. There was no significant difference in overall and each of six aspects of quality of work life for lecturers with difference work experiences. When examining in each aspect the quality of work life in adequate and economics of teachers with 10 years of more of work experiences were statistically significant higher than those with less than 10 years work experiences at .05 leve 5. There was no significant difference in overall and each of six aspects of quality of work life for lecturers with difference educational level When examining in each aspect the quality of work life in adequate and economics for lecturers with bachelors degree was statistically significant higher than those with master degree or higher at .05 level. 6. There was no significant difference in overall and each of six aspects of quality of work life for lecturers with difference family income. When examining in each aspect the quality of work life in competency development and relationship with peers of instructors with high family income was statistically significant higher than those with low family income at .05 level.

The purpose of this research were to study Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakorn personnel working morale and compare their working morale in sex age experience education position and working field. Questionnaires were used to collect data from 1139 Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakorn personnel. Eight Hundred and seven questionnaires were returned.