The objectives of this research were to study and to compare the information literacy level of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon undergraduate students by dividing into faculties and experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. The samples were undergraduate students in 9 faculties who were studying in second semester of academic year 2009. The 460 samples were taken a random sample by faculties’ stratification. The data were collected by information literacy test and mark record form which were four - level rating scale questions. The results were analyzed by percentage average value standard deviation F-test and t-test

The objectives of this research were to study and to compare the information literacy level of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon undergraduate students by dividing into faculties and experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. The samples were undergraduate students in 9 faculties who were studying in second semester of academic year 2009. The 460 samples were taken a random sample by faculties’ stratification. The data were collected by information literacy test and mark record form which were four - level rating scale questions. The results were analyzed by percentage average value standard deviation F-test and t-test The results were as follows: 1. Most of all students had medium information literacy level. For consideration of each aspect students had ability in every aspect at medium level. The highest ability of students was to access the needed information effectively and efficiently the next were the ability to determine the extent of information needed ; to evaluate information and its sources critically and to incorporate selected information into their knowledge bases. 2. Students that learnt in different faculties had different information literacy with statistically significant level at .01. Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher information literacy level than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Science and Technology’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. For consideration of each aspect it showed that every aspect was different with statistically significant level at .01.2.1 For the ability of determining the extent of information needed it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of determining the extent of information needed than Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. 2.2 For the ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. 2.3 For the ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students and Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students. 2.4 For the ability of using information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose It showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of using information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students. 2.5 For the ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Engineering’s students.3. The students who had different experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects they had different information literacy with statistically significant level at .01. The students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had higher information literacy than the students who had no experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. For consideration of each aspect it showed that the students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had different the ability of determining the extent of information needed; the ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently; the ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base; the ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally with statistically significant level at .01. For the ability of using information efficiently in order to reach the objective was different with statistically significant level at .05 by means of the students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had higher information literacy than the students who had no experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects in every aspect.

The objective of this research is to study Valentine Present Buying Behavior undergraduate students Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phranakhon. The purpose of this research were firstly to Valentine Present Buying Behavior of the bachelors’ Faculty of Home Economics Technology of Rajamangala University of Technology Phranakhon and secondly to study the relationship of between personal background and Valentine Present Buying Behavior of undergraduate students Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phranakhon. This research was divided into marketing factor and survey research. The sampling were 305 undergraduate students faculty of Home Economics Technology of Rajamangala University of Technology Phranakhon. The research tool was questionnaires and by analyzing statistical packages from social science programs and by using percentage and means. The result were found that Most undergraduate students faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phranakhon had bought Valentine presents from shops. They were bought for boy friends or girl friends price was 100 – 500 Bahts. The buying reason was depended on present styles. Flowers were the first buying Valentine present the planning in Valentine present buying was saving the most buying place was department stores. Friends accompanied them Valentines presents. Buyer decided by themselves on Valentine’s Day buyers bought Valentin presents about 1 - 5 pieces. Those who had never bouht Valentine Day’s present gave the reason of extravagance.

The purposes of this research were to : 1) compare creative writing achievement of students learning Thai Folk song and learning Thai Moders song as Aids ; 2) study the creative writing progress of the students in both groups by comparing between pretest scores and posttest scores ; find creative writing means scores and standanrd deviation of two student groups and find the percentages of the affective means scores and psychomotor means scores of the both groups. Samples were 62 students at the first level of Bachelor Degree from two classrooms : 31 students of each at Rajamangala University of Technology during 2008 academic year. The basis on Using Thai Language One mean scores of two student groups were not significantly different at th .05 level. The students were equally divided into two experimental groups. The first group learned Thai Folk song as aids while the second group learned Thai Modern song as aids. The research tools consisted of creative writing pretests and posttests instruments for development creative writing and creative writing lesson plans. The procedures were as following. Firstly the creative writing achievement tests were administered to both groups of students as pretests. Secondly sixteen creative writing lesson plans learning Thai Folk song as aids were given to the first experimental group while another sixteen creative writing lesson plans learning Thai Modern song as aids were given to the second experimental group. Finally the creative writing achievement tests which were similar to the pretests were administered to both groups as posttests. The results were as following. I) The creative writing achievement ofstudents learning Thai Folk song and leaming Thai Modem SOlg as aids was not significantly different at the .05 level. 2) The mean scores of two student groups between pretests and posttests were significantly different at the .05 level. The posttest mean scores of both groups were higher than the pretest mean scores. 3) The averages of mean scores and standard deviations of students learning Thai Folk song as aids were 15.31 and 2.80 and another experimental group learning Thai Modem song as aids were 15.63 and 3.18 4) The percentages of the affective mean scores and psychomotor mean scores of students learning Thai Folk song as aids were 87.64 and 87.22 and another group learning Thai Modem song were 87.18 and 86.01 respectively.