The objectives of this research were to 1) study current situation perceived problems and developmental method of Learner-Centered Teaching-Learning Approach of instructors of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon 2) compare the current situation of Learner-Centered Teaching-Learning Approach of instructors classified by faculties and 3) propose developmental method of Learner-Centered Teaching-Learning Approach of instructors of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon The sample studied were 257 instructors from all faculties who returned the complete questionnaires to researcher and 2.412 students selected by stratified sampling. The data was collected through questionnaires constructed by researcher. The statistics used for data analysis were mean standard deviation one way analysis of variance and Schffes multiple comparison method. The results were as follows: 1. Learner-centered Teachng-Learning Appoach of instructors of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon was at high level (= 3.36). Regarding problems affected learner-Centered Teaching-Learning Approach of instructors it was found that instructors positive attitude toward Learner-Centered Teaching-Learning Approach was at intermedate level and instructors knowledge concerning the Approach was also at intemediate level. moreover it was found that instruclors possessed problems in relation to facilitate faclors of Learner-centered Teaching-learning Approach at intermediate level. 2. Instructors from different facuities had statistically difference of Learner-Centered Teaching-Learning Approach with a level of .01 significarce. 3. The significance of Learrer-Centered Teaching-Learning Approach should be stressed. In additon the better understanding of Learner-Centered Teaching-Leaming techiques should be trained to all instructors Besides the students should be encouraged to study from outside resources more and more.

The purpose to this research was to assessment the graduate Diploma Program of Teaching Profession at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon Faculty of Industrial Education of the curriculum used. Research population consisted of graduate students diploma degree graduate their superiors and instructors. Simple random sampling gave the sample size of 549 people were selected from purposive sampling. The research tools were a questionnaire and a focus group discussion recording form. Data analysis employed basic statistics of frequency mean and percentage including content analysis for qualitative data. The findings of this research were as follows: 1) Primary components of the curriculum were suitable at high level. 2) Course structure and content was suitable at high level. 3) Characteristics of lecturers were suitable at high level.4) Instructional and evaluation activities were suitable at high level. 5) Factors contributing to the teaching of the course were also found suitable at high level. On the contrary Journals related to inadequate service and problems of withdrawal teaching materials. However the curriculum development should be updated to suit the needs of society and science is always developing.

The purpose of the study was fourfold: 1) to construct a computer-assisted-instruction (CAI) of Basic Thai for Business Communication at 2) to determine the efficiency of the CAI at 80/80; 3) to compare the student learning achievement of the CAI based on the pretest and posttest scores ; and 4) to determine the students’ satisfaction towards the CAI. The subjects of the study were the 30 first-year undergraduate students majoring in Finance and Marketing the Faculty of Business Administration at Rajamangala University of Technology Pranakorn in 2008. The instrument and procedures comprised 4 parts. Part one contains the 8 units of CAI of Basic Thai for Business Communication each consisting of examples an end-of-unit exercise and a 5-item-end-of-unit test to measure lesson efficiency. Part two is the try-out CAI to determine its efficiency based on the results of the three respective groups which were initially 6 students majoring in Accountancy then 10 students majoring in Accountancy and finally 30 students majoring in Accountancy from the Faculty of Business Administration. The data were analyzed in percentage and mean. Part three comprises the tests consisting of the 30-item pretest and posttest containing the shuffled pretest items to compare the student achievement. The learning achievement was determined by t-test. Part four is the 10-rating scale items to survey the students’ satisfaction towards the CAI. The data were interpreted in mean score.The results indicated as follows: 1) the CAI of Basic Thai for Business Communication can be effectively complemented to teaching and learning; 2) the efficiency indication of the CAI of Basic Thai for Business Communication was higher than the set criteria 80/80 at 84.58/87.44; 3) the posttest scores were significantly higher than the pretest scores at 0.05; 4) The students were extremely satisfied with the CAI of Basic Thai for Business Communication in all aspects at Σ x 4.37.

The objectives of this research were to study and to compare the information literacy level of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon undergraduate students by dividing into faculties and experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. The samples were undergraduate students in 9 faculties who were studying in second semester of academic year 2009. The 460 samples were taken a random sample by faculties’ stratification. The data were collected by information literacy test and mark record form which were four - level rating scale questions. The results were analyzed by percentage average value standard deviation F-test and t-test The results were as follows: 1. Most of all students had medium information literacy level. For consideration of each aspect students had ability in every aspect at medium level. The highest ability of students was to access the needed information effectively and efficiently the next were the ability to determine the extent of information needed ; to evaluate information and its sources critically and to incorporate selected information into their knowledge bases. 2. Students that learnt in different faculties had different information literacy with statistically significant level at .01. Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher information literacy level than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Science and Technology’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. For consideration of each aspect it showed that every aspect was different with statistically significant level at .01.2.1 For the ability of determining the extent of information needed it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of determining the extent of information needed than Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. 2.2 For the ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students and Faculty of Industrial Education’s students. 2.3 For the ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students and Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students. 2.4 For the ability of using information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose It showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of using information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Engineering’s students Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students. 2.5 For the ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally it showed that Faculty of Business Administration’s students had higher ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally than Faculty of Mass Communication Technology’s students Faculty of Liberal Arts’ students Faculty of Home Economics Technology’s students and Faculty of Engineering’s students.3. The students who had different experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects they had different information literacy with statistically significant level at .01. The students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had higher information literacy than the students who had no experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. For consideration of each aspect it showed that the students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had different the ability of determining the extent of information needed; the ability of accessing the needed information effectively and efficiently; the ability of evaluating information and its sources critically and incorporating selected information into one’s knowledge base; the ability of understanding the economic legal and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and use information ethically and legally with statistically significant level at .01. For the ability of using information efficiently in order to reach the objective was different with statistically significant level at .05 by means of the students who had experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects had higher information literacy than the students who had no experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects in every aspect.

The objectives of this research were to study and to compare the information literacy level of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon undergraduate students by dividing into faculties and experiences of studying concerning information literacy subjects. The samples were undergraduate students in 9 faculties who were studying in second semester of academic year 2009. The 460 samples were taken a random sample by faculties’ stratification. The data were collected by information literacy test and mark record form which were four - level rating scale questions. The results were analyzed by percentage average value standard deviation F-test and t-test