This research aims to study the factors affecting the attitude of students in faculty of home economics technology towards work in factory of garment industry. Contain factor of personal characteristics of students the family background of students and the learning environment of students. Population is divisions of fashion merchandising technology and fashion clothing & textile design class 1-4 of Year 2555 total 210 people. Tool used was the questionnaire. Statistics used were percentage mean standard deviation correlation coefficient of Pearson and multiple regression analysis. The results showed factors affecting attitude towards work in factory of garment industry of students in faculty of home economics technology statistically significant at the .01 level has 3 factors. Sort by factors affecting most to the least 1) learning environment of students 2) Number of subjects for textile cutting and sewing learned ever 3) Personal characteristics of students and could explain the variability of attitude towards work in factory of garment industry at 77.1 percent of this population.

The purposes of this research are to study water and electricity consumption behavior of the students to study understanding of water and electricity saving and to compare the difference of water and electricity consumption behavior classified as personal characteristic of the students Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. This research was descriptive research. The sample group used in the research was the students Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Size of the sample group was specified to be 325 people by stratified sampling. The tool used in data analysis was questionnaire divided into 3 parts including part 1: questions regarding general details of a respondent part 2: questions regarding knowledge of water and electricity saving consumption the students of Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon and part 3: questions regarding water and electricity consumption behavior of the students Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The statistics used in data analysis consisted of frequency percentage mean standard deviation and hypothesis testing using t-test and ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) for testing parallel difference by LSD method. The research result found that: 1. The level of water and electricity consumption behavior of the students Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon was overall in the moderate level. 2. The level of understanding and knowledge regarding water and electricity saving of the students Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon was overall in the moderate level. 3. The comparison of different behavior of water and electricity consumption specified according to personal characteristics could be summarized that the students having different gender class and major had identical water consumption behavior and the students having different gender class and major had identical electricity consumption behavior. On the other hand the students having different major had statistical significance in electricity consumption behavior at 0.05

The objectives of this research were to study and compare factors affecting dropping out of undergraduates in Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The finding on four types of factors were launched : personal educational institute family and social factor. Survey research methodology was exploited by distributing questionnaires to sample group of 638 RMUTP undergraduates in 2012 academic year. And the data was analyzed by the percentage the standard deviation the t-test and one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results were as followed : the personal factor as a whole was at low level they were : insufficient background knowledge in their fields capability in passing the examination getting low grade point average learning without planning boring of learning facing financial problem negative attitude in vocational field learning in dislike branch absence in class and having problems on family responsibility. On the institute factors as a whole it was at moderate level the causes were: inadequate facilities and services of the institute personal safety learning without instruments lack of helpfulness for the handicapped institute’s strict discipline inappropriate laboratory and buildings the executive management’s transparency institute’s relations with students unsuitable activities for learning expensive fee the students’ entrance without admission system overloaded extracurricular activities. On the family factor it was at low level as a whole they were : economics problems the family’s poverty parents’ attitude towards the institute single-mom’s burdens stability of parents career. Finally the social factor as a whole it was at low level they were : distance from students’ home the freshmen’s traditions self( 4) adjustment among peer group improperly learning environment quarrels and conflicts with others and freshmen’s assimilation in new surroundings. By comparing personal factors to family factors the study found that all factors were nonsignificantly different at the level of 0.05. While the institute factors and the social factors were significant different at the level 0.05

This Research possesses the purposes that were 1) to study the state of collaboration in quality assurance of Faculty of Home Economic Technology2) to develop the quality assurance administration of the faculty. The tools have been employed in this research were the collection of 82 questionnaires about quality assurance administration and 5 interviews to specialist. The analysis of quantitative data has employed descriptive statistics using mean and standard deviation as the tool of measurement and the results were evaluated in 5 degree of evaluation form and data content analysis has also been performed. The results of this research could be summarized as follows. The major part of the respondents was female (73.17%). The average age was 31-40 years old (29.27%). The education background was Master jDegree with 11-15 years of work experience (45.13%). The respondent were lecturers of the institute (40.25%). in medium degree (42.69%). and have opined that the performance of quality assurance would assess the general work in medium degree (39.02%) and satisfied with quality assurance system in medium level (42.68%). The high degree of collaboration in quality assurance was that the faculty encouraged the collaboration in quality assurance (= 3.62) and the respondent of questionnaire and that the respondent of particlpated in involved task in order to reach the aim of the result (= 3.51) All the questions at collaboration in medium level (= 3.17). The result of developing the quality assurance adminstration of the faculty in research art and culture maintaining academic service and education field show that overa parts were in high level (= 3.49 3.43 3.42 and 3.41). The respondents confronted problems and obstacles in quality assurance and required the development in quality assurance by modifying method of administration with the aim that the participators could avoid the problems and could reduce load of administrative part of the task.

This research aims to study students’ lifestyles at the Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Their lifestyles were studied in 4 aspects: education social activity and expense. The representative students were selected from the total 310 students that enrolled in the first semester of 2554 academic year. The sampling number was proportioned based on gender and major subjects. The used research tool was questionnaires. The obtained data was then analyzed statistically including mean standard deviation t-test value and variance following the One-Way ANOVA. It was found that the students have their lifestyles and expenses in the moderate level. Compared between male and female their lifestyles in terms of education social and activity are different significantly whereas their expense is not. Similar to the gender parameter students from different major subjects have different lifestyles in terms of education social and activity but they have the same styles in term of expense.