The research of strategic accounting information systems of technology and targeted industry groups to Thailand 4.0 was aimed at studying 1) strategic accounting information systems of technology and targeted industry groups to Thailand 4.0 and 2) factors related to strategic accounting information systems of technology and targeted industry groups to Thailand 4.0. The questionnaires were constructed as a research tool for collecting data from 400 entrepreneurs in technology and targeted industry groups. The data was statistically analyzed by frequency distribution percentage mean standard deviation and multiple classification analysis: MCA. The research findings indicated that most entrepreneurs in the technology and targeted industry groups were in food agriculture and biotechnology. Their capital to run business at the present time was between baht 1000001-1500000. The average number of employees was 4.75. They had income of baht 5000001-7500000 per year. Most of them employed companies or organizations to develop their own accounting information systems and their practicable period was 7.61 years. The capacity accounting information systems was totally at high level ( =3.64). Also the usability of accounting information systems was totally at high level ( =3.67) whose data collection was at =4.00 data processing at =3.66 data controlling at =3.53 and information generation at =3.51 respectively. The hypothesis testing results at statistical significance of 0.05 showed that the capacity of accounting information systems was the vital factor relating to data collection data processing data controlling and information generation and the annual income of entrepreneurs in strategic accounting information systems to Thailand 4.0 was related to data collection data processing and strategic accounting information systems to Thailand 4.0.

This research is to investigate the effects of audit innovation on sustainable audit success of CPA in Thailand by collecting data from 4292 auditors in Thailand by using a questionnaire as an instrument. The results of statistics used for analyzing the collected data were simple linear regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis indicated audit innovation had positive relationships with audit quality and audit reputation. Especially effective of Modern Equipment Integrative of audit search technique and audit quality had positive relationships with audit reputation. Moreover audit quality had positive relationships with audit sustainable. The results obtained from this study could be used as guidelines for developing creating and improving the efficiency of auditor performance and practice audit process to create reliability to the public and to be able to survive sustainably in a long period of time.

The purpose of this study is to study the factors that affect the accounting performance of the quality accounting office. The population group is the accountants operating in the 160 quality accounting firms. 115 sample are collected and the sample size is calculated using Taro formula. The data is analyzed using descriptive statistics including frequency percentage mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics including Independent sample T-test One Way ANOVA Pearsons Correlation Coefficient and Multiple Regression Analysis. The study results showed that of the overall and individual motivation factors Motivation factors and Supporting factors affected the accounting performance of the quality accounting offices at the highest level while the sample group had accounting skills in general in the highest level. The hypothesis testing found that 1) age education level and the different incomes affected the efficiency of accounting operations of different quality accounting firms 2) Motivation and Supportive factors had no influence on the efficiency of accounting performance of quality accounting firms and 3) professional knowledge professional skills and professional attitude had a positive influence on the efficiency of accounting operations of the quality accounting offices.

The purpose of this research is to study the innovation potential towards the development of accounting firm representatives licensed by the Revenue Department. The sample group used in the research was the owners organizational leaders or executives of the accounting firms that were authorized by the Revenue Department. Forty-four questionnaires were used as a tool for data collection in Bangkok. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis were employed. The research found that overall there were opinions about the innovation potential affecting the model development of the accounting firms. The innovation potential in the resource utilization was rated the highest followed by in the learning and in the strategies respectively. As for the overall opinions on the model development of the accounting firms The highest rated ones were ethic requirements followed by monitoring and operation respectively

The objectives of this research is for study of Quality Control in accordance with Quality Control Standard No.1 (TSQC1) and Audit Quality test the difference of Quality Control in accordance with Quality Control Standard No.1 (TSQC1) and Audit Quality test the relationship and positive impact of quality control of audit firm in accordance with Quality Control Standard No.1 (TSQC1) with Overview Audit Quality of Big 4 and Non-Big 4 Auditing Firms. This research is done by give out questionnaires and in-depth interviews method which used populations of 228 auditors certified by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Thailand by receiving 115 replied questionnaires which considered as 50 percent and using Descriptive Statistics T-test Statistics Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient and Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis The results say that Quality Control in accordance with Quality Control Standard No.1 (TSQC1) in overview and individual element of Big 4 and Non-Big 4 Auditing Firms completely applied. Big 4 Auditing Firms have higher average than Non-Big 4 Auditing Firms highest average is for ethical requirement. Audit Quality both in overview and individual element Big 4 and Non-Big 4 Auditing Firms completely applied. Big 4 Auditing Firms have higher average than Non-Big 4 Auditing Firms highest average is for clearness. From test hypothesis of quality control of auditing firm in accordance with Quality Control Standard No.1 (TSQC1) of Big 4 and Non-Big 4 Auditing Firms is according to assumptions by having differences in all elements while Audit Quality is according to assumptions only one element which is clearness no difference in statistical significant. Quality Control in accordance with Quality Control Standard No.1 (TSQC1) has relationship and positive impact with Audit Quality and from prediction equation find that enhance of audit quality of auditing firm should emphasize to Quality Control in accordance with Quality Control Standard No.1 (TSQC1) in engagement performance and ethical requirement.