The objectives of this research were to 1) develop the Multimedia Computer Assisted Instruction for Teaching Illuminant Engineering on Interior Lighting Design 2) compare learning achievement between before and after learning 3) evaluate students’ learning progress and 4) study students’ satisfaction on the Multimedia Computer Assisted Instruction. The sample studied were 28 third year students belonging to the field of electrical power engineering faculty of Industrial Education Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakon. The instruments of this research included 1) the Multimedia Computer Assisted Instruction for teaching Illuminant Engineering on Interior Lighting Design 2) an quality evaluation questionnaire of the Multimedia Computer Assisted Instruction 3) pretest and posttest of learning achievement and 4) student satisfaction questionnaire on the Multimedia Computer Assisted Instruction. The results were as follow: 1. The efficiency of the Multimedia Computer Assisted Instruction for teaching Illuminant Engineering on Interior Lighting Design was 81.45/85.71 which was higher than the criteria set of 80/80. 2. The mean score of posttest ( X = 12.68) was significantly higher than pretest ( X = 5.54) at .01 level. ง 3. The evaluation result of learning progress by the method of Average Normalized Gain was 0.77 which was in a high progress level. 4. Students’ satisfaction on the Multimedia Computer Assisted Instruction for teaching Illuminant Engineering on Interior Lighting Design was at the level of the most satisfaction ( X = 4.80).

ปัจจุบันการเปลี่ยนแปลงของสังคมและความเจริญก้าวหน้าทางเทคโนโลยีมากขึ้น มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนคร คณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์ ซึ่งเป็นสถาบันอุดมศึกษาด้านวิชาชีพและเทคโนโลยี จึงดำเนินการศึกษาปัญหาและความต้องการของนักศึกษาที่มีต่อการจัดการศึกษาของคณะ เพื่อใช้เป็นแนวทางในการปรับปรุงและพัฒนาการเรียนการสอนและสิ่งอำนวยความสะดวกต่างๆ ในการจัดการศึกษาให้มีคุณภาพยิ่งขึ้น และเป็นไปตามความต้องการของผู้เรียนโดยใช้กลุ่มตัวอย่างในการวิจัยได้แก่นักศึกษาคณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์ ระดับปริญญาตรีปีการศึกษา 2551 จำนวน 450 คน จำแนกเป็นนึกษาชั้นปีที่ 1 จำนวน 167 คน ชั้นปีที่ 2 จำนวน 121 คน ชั้นปีที่ 3 จำนวน 75 คน ชั้นปีที่ 4 จำนวน 87 คน โดยแจกแบบสอบถามจำนวน 450 ชุด และได้รับแบบสอบถามคืนในฉบับสมบูรณ์ จำนวน 450 ชุด คิดเป็นร้อยเปอร์เซ็นต์ของจำนวนผู้ตอบแบบสอบถามทั้งหมด ค่าคะแนนเฉลี่ยวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลโดยใช้โปรแกรมคอมพิวเตอร์สำเร็จรูป SPSS การแจกแจงความถี่และร้อยละ ส่วนเบี่ยงเบนมาตรฐาน (S.D.) การทดสอบค่ามี (t-test)

This survey research has a purpose to study the personality of students at the Mechanical Engineering Department Faculty of Industrial Education Rajamangkala University of Technology Phranakhon. The improvement of test questionnaire 16 PF (Sixteen Personality Test ) of Raymond B. Cat Resort from the total of 108 students who using a tiered Iandscape sampling (Stratified Random Sampling). Students from Mechanical Engineering. Tools used in evaluation of research data using a questionnaire and data analysis methods.Calculate overall percentage of arithmetic mean (arithmetic mean) on median comparisons t-test and F-test of students personality areas. Research results can be summarized as follows. 1. Personality with a teacher of mechanical cngineering students by age showed that all of the moderates.The average of the maximum a person is sincere and guileless disclosed. 2. Personality with a teacher of mechanical engineering students by age is found that the older students have different personality. And students over 27 years pf age are not timid than courageous. Students aged belwecn 23-27 years. 3 Personality on a teachers student in meehanical engineering disciplines. Ievels by an average score found that students with different rate lcvcls. It is a personality who loves to collect dissociation. Different found that students with grade lowcr than the2.00 level as people like humility. Different Found that students with grade between2.01 to 2.99 4.Personality on a teachers student in mechanical engineering disciplines. by classs year study.shows.students leam in diflcrent class years are.Pcrsonality is about people like humility and Dissociate diflerent. 5. Personality with a teacher of mcchanical engineering students by class year to find a more different pair were found about a person who loves to collect. Dissociate it. Students who study in year1 class who likes to collect. Dissociate more. Students studying in year 3 th but this year found that about understanding Students learn in class at 1year in higher than intellect. students studying in year 3th years.

The purpose of this research was to developing of teamwork ability for students of industrial education faculty major electronic engineering. By study was to team work ability for students. This research was developing questionnaire team cohesiveness inventory and teamwork inventory by Thurstone. The target population of the study was students of Rajamangala University of Technology Pha Nakon Faculty Industiral Education Major Electronic Engineering. The representative sample of 19 students were proportionally and simple random sampling by draw lots methods. Data were collected by means of questionnaires and analyzed by descriptive statistics presenting in form of tables. The findings of the study were that students major Electronic Engineering have team cohesiveness or teamwork. As students have thinking qualities of positive. The developing of teamwork ability decisive. The portion teamwork have qualities more than half good and developing teamwork must aspect support and to rest assured. And then aspect cooperate and used contradict in good.

This survey research has a purpose to study the personality of students at the Mechanical Engineering Department Faculty of Industrial Education Rajamangkala University of Technology Phranakhon. The improvement of test questionnaire 16 PF (Sixteen Personality Test) of Raymond B. Cat Resort from the total of 108 students who using a tiered landscape sampling (Stratified Random Sampling). Students from Mechanical Engineering. Tools used in evaluation of research data using a questionnaire and data analysis methods. Calculate overall percentage of arithmetic mean (arithmetic mean) or median comparisons t-test and F -test of students personality areas. Research results can be summarized as follows. 1.Personality with a teacher of mechanical engineering students by age showed that all of the moderates. The average of the maximum a person is sincere and guileless disclosed. 2. Personality with a teacher of mechanial engineering students by age is found that the older students have different personality. and students over 27 years of age are not timid than courageous Students aged between 23-27 years. 3. Personality on a teachers student in mechanical engineering disciplines. Levels by an average score found students with diffcrent rate levels. It is apersonality who loves to collect dissociation. Different Found that students with grade lower than the2.00 level as people like humility. Dissociate more. Students with a grade between 2.01 to 2.99. 4.Personality on a teachers student in mechanical engineering disciplines. By class year study. Shows students learn in diflerent class years are. Personality is about people like humility and dissociate different. 5. Personality with a teacher of mechanical engineering students by class year to find a more different pair were found about a person who loves to collect. Dissociate it. Students who study in year 1 class who likes to collect. Dissociate more. Students studying in year 3rd but this year found the about understanding. Students learn in class at 1th year is higher than intellet. Students studying in year 3rd years.