The objectives of this research are: to study the characteristics of students in the Faculty of Engineering at Rajamangala University of Technology Pra Nakorn North Bangkok Campus that influence to the risk of withdrawal from Calculus 2 for Engineers; to predict the risk of withdrawal from Calculus 2 for Engineers; and to use the results of the study for planning and solving the problems of withdrawal from Calculus 2 for Engineers. The sample is 226 students in the Faculty of Engineering at Rajamangala University of Technology who enrolled the Calculus 2 for engineers in the second semester of the academic year 2009. The data are from the questionnaire. The factors considered are grad point average the number of enrollments for the Calculus 1 for engineers Calculus 1 for Engineers grade the number of courses that emphasize on calculation that were enrolled in the second semester of the academic year 2009 the sacrifices of students for the Calculus 2 for Engineers course and the need to withdraw from Calculus 2 for Engineers course before other courses. The logistic regression model in which the parameters are estimated by using Bayesian methods is used for analyzing the data. The study shows that the factors that influence to the risk of withdrawal from the Calculus 2 for Engineers are grade point average Calculus 1 for Engineers grade the number of courses that emphasize on calculation that were enrolled in the second semester of the academic year 2009 and the sacrifices of students for the Calculus 2 for Engineers and the need to withdraw from Calculus 2 for Engineers before other courses. The factor that does not influence to the risk of withdrawal from the Calculus 2 for Engineers is the number of enrollments for the Calculus 1 for Engineers.

The purposes of the research were to create computer assisted instruction for Basic Engineering Training Subject (Unit 1-4) to find out the efficiency validation of computer assisted instruction based on the standard of 90/90 and to analyse the learning achievement of the students after using the computer assisted instruction. The subjects in the study were 17 first-year diploma engineering students enrolling at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The researcher made the experiment by baving the students pretest. Then they studied by using the computer assisted instruction. After the students had posttest the efficiency of the computer assisted instruction was calculated as well as the leaming achievement was analysed. The research result revealed that the efficiency of the computer assisted instruction was at the standard of 90/90 Moreover the learning achievement after using the computer assisted instruction was different at the significant level of 0.05.

The purpose of this research was to developing of teamwork ability for students of industrial education faculty major electronic engineering. By study was to team work ability for students. This research was developing questionnaire team cohesiveness inventory and teamwork inventory by Thurstone. The target population of the study was students of Rajamangala University of Technology Pha Nakon Faculty Industiral Education Major Electronic Engineering. The representative sample of 19 students were proportionally and simple random sampling by draw lots methods. Data were collected by means of questionnaires and analyzed by descriptive statistics presenting in form of tables. The findings of the study were that students major Electronic Engineering have team cohesiveness or teamwork. As students have thinking qualities of positive. The developing of teamwork ability decisive. The portion teamwork have qualities more than half good and developing teamwork must aspect support and to rest assured. And then aspect cooperate and used contradict in good.

This survey research has a purpose to study the personality of students at the Mechanical Engineering Department Faculty of Industrial Education Rajamangkala University of Technology Phranakhon. The improvement of test questionnaire 16 PF (Sixteen Personality Test) of Raymond B. Cat Resort from the total of 108 students who using a tiered landscape sampling (Stratified Random Sampling). Students from Mechanical Engineering. Tools used in evaluation of research data using a questionnaire and data analysis methods. Calculate overall percentage of arithmetic mean (arithmetic mean) or median comparisons t-test and F -test of students personality areas. Research results can be summarized as follows. 1.Personality with a teacher of mechanical engineering students by age showed that all of the moderates. The average of the maximum a person is sincere and guileless disclosed. 2. Personality with a teacher of mechanial engineering students by age is found that the older students have different personality. and students over 27 years of age are not timid than courageous Students aged between 23-27 years. 3. Personality on a teachers student in mechanical engineering disciplines. Levels by an average score found students with diffcrent rate levels. It is apersonality who loves to collect dissociation. Different Found that students with grade lower than the2.00 level as people like humility. Dissociate more. Students with a grade between 2.01 to 2.99. 4.Personality on a teachers student in mechanical engineering disciplines. By class year study. Shows students learn in diflerent class years are. Personality is about people like humility and dissociate different. 5. Personality with a teacher of mechanical engineering students by class year to find a more different pair were found about a person who loves to collect. Dissociate it. Students who study in year 1 class who likes to collect. Dissociate more. Students studying in year 3rd but this year found the about understanding. Students learn in class at 1th year is higher than intellet. Students studying in year 3rd years.

In ability development research in the team work for the student of Industry Education Faculty Major Civil engineering. The objective of research is to know the problem and education guideline for student being sacrifice and public spirit. The student should know how to live pith society and can work in team under the limits of educational problem and guideline of ability research development of 18 students by using the in influencing factor to team work namely in individual difference factor the result of team work the cause of team work conflict the leadership the problem of member in team work the result of research is the students do not still give and importance to the work 50-61 percentages approximately.