The purpose of this research is to find the relation between stress and strain called as the Flow Stress Curve for 0.4 mm thickness stainless steel (SS 304). Two main methods are used: the Uniaxial tensile test and the Hydraulic Bulge Test (HBT). The relation between stress and strain from both methods would then be compared and simulated into cubic-shaped models by using Finite Element method. Results show that sheet metal formation simulated by using the flow stress curve obtained from Hydraulic bulge test can have the height of up to 40 millimeters before the work piece starts to lacerate. On the other hand if the flow stress curve obtained from Uniaxial tensile test is used the work piece will only be able to form about 15 millimeters before lacerating. The preliminary summary for this research can be said that the analysis for Hydraulic bulge test gives better results than Uniaxial tensile test as it has similar conditions to the actual formation process.

The purposes of this research were to create and evaluate the effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction about Tensile test The CAI consisted of 9 lessons The sample was 20 first year diploma students in Tool and die make Department Faculty of Production Technology. Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. First of all the students did the pre-test and then they studied via CAI. After that they did the post-test. After using CAI the result was evaluated to find effectiveness and learning achievement was analyzed. The finding showed that CAI effectiveness reached the standard of 90/90 Further more the students knowleage increased at significant level of 0.01