จำนวน Repository ( 2 )

ปัญหาการจัดการแข่งขันกีฬาภายในคณะศิลปศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนคร ประจำปีการศึกษา 2555
ปัญหาการจัดการแข่งขันกีฬาภายในคณะศิลปศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนคร ประจำปีการศึกษา 2555

This research aims to study sports management in 2012 within the Faculty of Liberal Arts Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The data was collected by sending 150 questionnaires to the organizing Committee and the questionnaires were returned 100 percent. The data was analyzed by using percentage mean and standard deviation and the data presented in the form of tables and essay. It was found that: 1. Sports problem within the Faculty of Liberal Arts Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon 2012 most problems of competition among faculty and staff have been less in all aspects. However the student affair committee has considered that the problems were at high level in the following aspects: 1) the committee’s coordination e.g. in meeting; 2) the ceremony and parade like the athletes’ preparation for medals management; 3) the tournament and the referee including competitive and lack of the referees inexperience referees lack of the athletes’ coordination and supporting fund and inappropriate time in competition; 4) the public relations e.g. lack of the facilities in public relations. 2. The requirements for organizing and conducting program should be annually once a year and lasted in 1-2 weeks. The program was not simultaneous with the class. There should be more public relation and more fund to support the event

2557
รูปแบบการจัดการแข่งขันกีฬามหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลแห่งประเทศไทย
รูปแบบการจัดการแข่งขันกีฬามหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลแห่งประเทศไทย

The purpose of this study was to investigate organization model of Rajamangala University of Technology Games of Thailand. Samples were 15 persons from the Executive Board of Rajamangala University of Technology Games of Thailand and specialists in sport management from various sport organizations. Questionnaire research instrument constructed by the researcher was used to collect data by Delphi technique. The data were then analyzed into frequency percentage median and inter-quartile range. It was found that: Appropriate organization model of Rajamangala University of Technology Games of Thailand should be divided into 7 aspects. The aspect details were: 1. OBJECTIVES: Objectives of games should be to develop students and personnel to be fit and healthy to show good spirit team-work self discipline and dedication; to promote conserve and develop Thai sports. 2. SCHEDULING AND MANAGEMENT: The games should be held annually for 8 days this should include Opening and Closin ceremony; method of competitive organizing in each sport should be in accordance with fixed time and according to international sport standards. Additionally current rules of sport associations of Thailand should be used. 3. THE NUMBER OF SPORTS: The number of sports should not be less than fifteen types and not more than twenty sports from four different groups of sport. Five from Required Sports: athletics swimming football basketball and volleyball. Eight from Elective International Sports i.e. Olympic Games Asian Games SEA Games or World University Games. One each from General Elective Sport and Thai sport. 4. PLAYERS: Players should be students who had already registered to study in the year of sport organizing. They should be players for only one university and were amateur players under the jurisdiction rules of Sport Authority of Thailand. They should have grade point average (GPA) not less than 2.00.5. HOST: The host university should prepare medals and certificates for champion and the two runner-ups. The Executive Board of Rajamangala University of Technology Games of Thailand should give rewards to the players who post a new record. 6. BOARDs: The board of Rajamangala University of Technology Games of Thailand should be comprised of two boards; the Executive Board and the Organizing Committee 7. EVALUATION: Rajamangala University of Technology Games of Thailand should be . evaluated from athletes team managers coaches referees and spectators within 30 days after the end of competition.

2554