The objectives of this research were to study about student’s quality of life level of the Faculty of Science and Fisheries Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya Trang Campus and compare student’s quality of life level which each gets different personal factors. The research group is the 310 students who study in 1-4 years of the Faculty of Science and Fisheries Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya Trang Campus. The research material was questionnaire. The Reliability value analyzing was 0.92. The results were as follows: 1. In whole student’s quality of life level of had got a good quality of life level such as life satisfaction self-concept and socioeconomic factors were good level while health and functioning was medium level. 2. Comparison about differences personal factors of student’s quality of life level found that different seniority and major influences to student’s quality of life.

The objectives of this research had to study and compare the problem and obstacle of freshmen student who had studying achievements lower than 2.00 in 3 aspects: the student teaching and studying environment aspect variable classified by sex and major. The research group was the freshman students of the Faculty of Science and Fisheries Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya Trang Campus and their studying achievement lower than 2.00. Interviewing was used the research material. The results showed as following: Problems and obstacles which had the most effected to the research group was the student espect for example basic knowledge living adjustment of student lack of motivation and enthusiasm to learn as well as teaching and studying aspect for example lecturer’s inadequate teaching methods respectively. Comparison between problem and obstacle of freshmen student who having studying achievements lower than 2.00 classified by sex and major was found that the different of sex had no statistical significant difference in all and each aspects. In addition the different of student’s major had no statistical significant difference in all aspect. Contrast to in each aspect the studying environment aspect was found statistical significant difference at the level of .05.