The objectives of this research are to propose a proper model for defective products in an autoparts manufacturing industry to apply the proposed model to the defective products data to investigate the factors related to the machines producing defective products and to compare the proposed model with the generalized estimating equations model (GEE). The proposed model is a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) in which the dependent variables have a Poisson distribution. The parameter are estimated using a Bayesian method. The data were collected from 12 machines 15 days for each machine from an autoparts manufacturing factory. The data collection dates vary depending on the working steps and the product types. The results show that the proposed model fits the data. The factors related to the machines producing defective products are working steps workers and product types. According to the estimates of the factors effects the working step producing the largest number of defective products is the working step 2 followed by the working steps 3 1 and 4 respectively. The worker producing the largest of defective products is the worker 4 followed by the workers 10 5 8 6 2 3 1 7 and 9 respectively. The product type 3 has the largest number of defective products followed by the product types 2 and 1 respectively. If the population-averaged effects are focused the GEE is applied. However the subject-specific is focused the GLMM is applied.

This research proposes a hidden Markov model for detecting machines with multiple fillers producing soft drink for quality control in order to reduce defective products. The proposed model is compared with a classical generalized estimating equations model (GEE). The monthly data the number of defective products the correctness and the time spending in correction were collected from a machine in a sample factory in Pratumthanee province. The two hidden states of the fillers are workable and unworkable. The states has a logistic distribution. The results show that the correctness of the filler error occurrence does not improve the probability of being in a unworkable state neither the period of time spending on correction. The current state seems to be the same as the previous state

The objectives of this research are to propose a proper model for detecting defective machines in auto parts factories to apply the proposed model to the defective product data and to investigate the factors influencing on the machine producing defective products. A Bayesian hidden Markov model (HMM) is adopted. The results show that if the number of defective products increases the machine will be in the hidden bad state. The probability of changing from a hidden bad state to a hidden good state is higher than the probability of changing from a hidden good state to a hidden good state. The highest probability that the machine will be in a good state is at the work process 4 followed by 1 3 and 2 respectively. The highest probability that the machine will be in hidden good state is at the Worker no. 10 followed 9 3 12 7 2 1 6 11 4 8 and 5 respectively and The highest probability that the machine will be in the hidden good state is at the product type 1 followed by 2 and 3 respectively.

This research proposes reliability analysis in order to find the probability that a machine will work properly the failure rates of a machine and the factors related to the failure rates. The data were collected from 8 types of machines in an autoparts manufacturing factory. They consist of the times measured from the first day of the study until the machine produces defective product workers and production steps. The study duration is 90 days. The results show that the probability that the machine type 4 will work properly more than days is 0.40 machine type 5 more than 68 days is 0.32 machine type 6 more than 72 days is 0.31 machine type 8 more than 85 days is 0.26 machine type 9 more than 109 days is 0.80 machine type 10 at more than 52 days is 0.38 machine type 11 more than 71 days is 0.32 and the probability that the machine type 12 will work properly more than 85 days is 0.26. The failure rate of the machine type 4 at day 51 is 6.61 machine type 5 at day 68 is 1.61 machine type 6 at day 72 is 0.77 machine type 8 at day 85 is 1.26 machine type 9 at day 109 is 1.31 machine type 10 at day 52 is 0.92 machine type 11 at day 71 is 1.24 and the failure rate of the machine type 12 at day 85 is 2.15. The factors influencing on the failure rates are worker group 2 and production step 3 at the significance of 0.05.