The purposes of this research were to compare the differences of the individual characteristics with performance of employees in state- owned enterprises. To study motivation affecting the work efficiency of the employees in the state enterprise unit. To study the principles of good governance affecting the work efficiency of employees in state enterprise agencies. To study of motivation and good governance principles affecting the efficiency of work performance of employees in state enterprise units The sample used in this study was 56 employees of state enterprise organizations in Thailand. 370 people by distributing questionnaires as data for data collection. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency percentage mean and standard deviation t-test f-test (One Way ANOVA). The relationships were used in Pearson s correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis. The analysis results showed that personal characteristics such as gender age education level Income per month job position job duration. There are no significant differences in the efficiency of the performance of the employees in state enterprise units. Motivation affects the efficiency of work performance (quality of work) of employees in state enterprise units at a moderate level. Motivation affects the efficiency of work performance (quantity of work) of employees in state enterprise units at a moderate level. Motivation affects the efficiency of work performance (time) of employees in state enterprise units at a moderate level. Motivation affects the efficiency of work performance (operating cost) of employees in state enterprise units at a moderate level. Good governance affects work efficiency (quality of work) of employees in state enterprises are at a high level. Good governance affects work efficiency (the quantity of work) of the employees in the state enterprise department is at a medium level. Good governance affects work efficiency (time) of the employees in the state enterprise department was at a medium level. Good governance affects work efficiency (operating expenses) of employees in state enterprise departments are at a medium level. Motivation and good governance principles affect work efficiency (quality of work) of employees in state enterprises are at a high level. Motivation and good governance principles affect work efficiency (the amount of work) of employees in state enterprise departments at a medium level. Motivation and good governance affect the efficiency of work (time) of employees in the department at a moderate level. Motivation and good governance principles affect work efficiency (operating expenses) of employees in state enterprises at a medium level. With a statistical significance of 0.05 .

The objective of this independent study was to investigate knowledge and understanding motivation and organizational commitment affecting the efficiency in work performance of accountants and to study the motivation in performance that affects the commitment of the accountants’ organization. The Population in the study was 255 accountants working in accounting services firms registered with the Department of Business Development. A questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis i.e. frequency percentage mean standard deviation Pearson’s correlation coefficient and multi regression analysis. The major findings indicated that 1) knowledge understanding and motivation affected the efficiency in work performance of accountants as a whole at the statistical significance level of 0.01. When considering each aspect the study shows that knowledge understanding and motivation affected the efficiency in work performance concerning quality quantity time and expenses at the statistical significance level of 0.01 The organizational commitment affected the efficiency performance in terms of expenses with the statistical significance level of 0.05 and 2) Work motivation positively correlated with the organizational commitment of accountants with statistical significance level of 0.01.

This objectives of this research were to 1) study the factors for the development of teachers’career advancement. Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon 2) To study the motivation for career advancement development of teachers of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. It is a quantitative research by quantitative survey. and qualitative interviews Data were collected from a sample group of 324 teachers in Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Use questionnaires and interviews as tools to collect data. The statistics used for analysis were frequency percentage mean and standard deviation. The results of the study from the sample group showed that 1) most of the personal factors were female aged 41–50 years single status masters degree. have an average monthly income of more than 45000 baht 2) Environmental factors within the organization such as job content rewards and career advancement opportunities. learning opportunity Academic Seminar for Teachers Career Development Fairness in salary assessments academic work position and fair returns; and 3) There should be guidelines for developing teacher career progression. Consisting of rewards and job security at a high level The organization shall assure employees that assessments are consistent with pre-declared methods. Executives who assess fair salaries and ensure that all teachers are treated equally including consistent treatment of employees. Fair management the real professionals in the organization have the majorty of the management term. Must have good governance credibility and professional management. supervisors and colleagues who are transparent and do not take advantage There is only a plan to encourage teachers to enter academic positions. But it does not support it seriously and does not support it in practice. not policy By facilitating the reduction of teaching hours and allowing free time to complete academic work. The problems and obstacles found were that there was no real promotion for teachers to enter academic positions. There is bullying at different faculties in the university. High-level executives must have good governance in all aspets of work.must not be biased No bias and no partisans. in order not to create divisions like the present Lack of motivation to work because of the lack of transparency and unfairness at the level of middle-level executives and doing the wrong thing at the faculty level There is no transparency in the operation. Salary Assessment consideration of merit Faculty Management System on campus Standard and fair authenticity like the old days. because the new generation lacks technical experience To manage the work correctly and up to the standard not conductive to work The management is inexperienced and the work is partisan and unfair. The teachers are bored. In working with and for guidelines for the development of teacher career advancement. There must be a serious professional development plan in the academic field. There is a practicality There is real support reduced teaching hours giving opportunities to do academic work in a concrete way. in the development of the teachers career advancement There must be a serious professional development plan in the academic field. There is a practicality There is real support reduced teaching hours giving opportunities to do academic work in a concrete way. There must be impartiality and fairness in the administration of all departments. and support all faculty members equally There is a mentor to help in doing academic work clearly seriously supporting. and should have competent management and have good governance in working more than it is There is still not as much as it should be to organize the subjects taught. The opening of cource in different faculities must be clear and transparent. Not helpful to their peers It must be accurate and allow students to choose to register for free electives on their own. Not for professional branches to arrange for students to study in baskets. Because of unfair selection of subjects the partisan system should have’s a budget to support and equipment. In doing academic work and contributing in terms of time for teachers to have time to do academic work by reducing the teaching hours in a concrete way and do not deduct teaching points But there is an agreement to submit academic work in the later semester after the teaching hours have been reduced. Opportunity to use vacation days or permission to do academic work without control and signing of official duties conducive to truly academic achievements But there must be an agreement to submit academic work in the next semester.