จำนวน Repository ( 2 )

การศึกษาความรู้และทัศนคติของนักศึกษาคณะเทคโนโลยีคหกรรมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนครที่มีต่อฉลากโภชนาการตามแบบจีดีเอ
การศึกษาความรู้และทัศนคติของนักศึกษาคณะเทคโนโลยีคหกรรมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนครที่มีต่อฉลากโภชนาการตามแบบจีดีเอ

The purposes of this research were : 1) A study of knowledge about the nutrition labeling formats GDA of Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon Students 2) A study of attitude towards the nutrition labeling formats GDA of Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon Students 3) Compare knowledge about the nutrition labeling formats GDA Classified by gender years of study and majors and 4) Compare attitude towards the nutrition labeling formats GDA Classified by gender years of study and majors. The sample were 307 first year to fourth year. The instrument was a questionnaire. Frequency percentage mean standard deviation t-test ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test were used in data analysis via computer program. The results showed that : 1) The most students have moderate level of knowledge and understanding 2) Students have a high level of attitudes when considering each item it was found that the items with the highest mean were: The GDA nutrition label is beneficial to everyone 3) Compare knowledge about the nutrition labeling formats GDA of Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon Students Classified by gender years of study and majors It was found that students with different levels of education and disciplines had different knowledge about nutritional labels in the GDA except for students with different sex. Knowledge of nutrition labeling according to GDA not different Statistically significant at the .05 level and 4) Compare attitude towards the nutrition labeling formats GDA of Faculty of Home Economics Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon students classified by gender years of study and majors it was found that students with gender education and different disciplines. Attitude toward nutritional labeling according to GDA not different statistically significant at the .05 level.

2563
ความรู้และเจตคติเกี่ยวกับการจัดการขยะเพื่อสร้างรายได้: กรณีศึกษาชุมชนพระยาประสิทธิ์ เขตดุสิต กรุงเทพมหานคร
ความรู้และเจตคติเกี่ยวกับการจัดการขยะเพื่อสร้างรายได้: กรณีศึกษาชุมชนพระยาประสิทธิ์ เขตดุสิต กรุงเทพมหานคร

The purpose of this study 1) Study knowledge and attitude towards waste management to generate income: case study of community Phya Prasit Dusit District Bangkok. 2) Comparison knowledge and attitude towards waste management to generate income: case study of community Phya Prasit Dusit District Bangkok classified by gender age occupation education and monthly income. The samples in this research were 154 members. The study participants selected by simple random sampling. The test with 20 items and questionnaires of rating scales with 20 items were used as the research instrument. Percentages means standard deviation t-test for Independent sample F-test and Scheffe’s test and Scheffe’s test analysis were statistical method to analyze data. The results were as follows: 1. Knowledge towards waste management to generate income of community Members Phya Prasit was in high levels while attitude towards waste management to generate income of community members Phya Prasit was in relatively high levels. 2. Comparison of knowledge and attitudes towards waste management to Generate income o community members Phya Prasit Dusit Bangkok. Found that Community members Phya Prasit with different sex age occupation education and income per month were different knowledge towards waste management to generate Incomes. Statistically significant differences at the significance level of 0.05. The attitude towards waste management to generate income it was found that community members Phya Prasit with different sex age education and income per month different attitude towards waste management to generate incomes. Statistically significant differences at the significance level of 0.05.

2561