This research aims to study the influences of sustainability management of environmental social and governance on sustainable corporate finance of the listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand including 1) the listed companies which have been selected to continuously get the Thailand Sustainability Investment award all of 29 companies and 2) the listed companies which have been selected to discontinuously get the Thailand Sustainability Investment award all of 17 companies for 6 years from 2015 to 2018. This research is the mixed method research in both the Quantitative Research by using Descriptive Statistic Analysis Comparison of means Analysis Correlation Coefficient Analysis and Panel Data Regression Analysis with Hausman Test and the Qualitative Research by in-depth interview with 5 persons of the management of the Thailand Sustainability Investment awarded companies. The research results revealed that in continued Thailand Sustainability Investment awarded companies the sustainability management of Environmental has negatively statistically significantly influenced the sustainable corporate finance by making Debt to Assets (DAR) to decrease and positively statistically significantly influenced it by making Market Value (TBQ) Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) to increase. In discontinued Thailand Sustainability Investment awarded companies it found that the sustainability management of Social has negatively statistically significantly influenced sustainable finance by making Debt to Assets (DAR) to decrease and the sustainability management of governance has positively statistically significantly influenced sustainable corporate finance by making Market Value (TBQ) Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) to increase.

This research aimed to study the relationship between Corporate Governance Social Responsibility and Profitability of 56 companies related to the agriculture and food industry and listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Data was collected for 2015 to 2020 and analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency percentage mean and standard deviation. Likewise this research also used inferential statistics including Pearson’s Correlation Analysis and Multiple Regression Analysis. The findings were Corporate Governance; Proportion of Independent Director (PID) had positively correlated with Profitability including the Return on Total Assets (ROA) the Return on Equity (ROE) and the Gross Profit Margin (GPM). The correlations were statistically significant at 0.01 and 0.05 levels. Besides Corporate Social Responsibility; the Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) and the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Activity (DCSRA) had also positively correlated with Profitability including the Return on Total Assets (ROA) the Return on Equity (ROE) and the Gross Profit Margin (GPM). The correlations were statistically significant at 0.01 and 0.05 levels.

The analysis of the relationship among dividends leverage ratios and profitability ratios of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand: non-life and life insurance sectors aims to study and analyze the financial presentation via financial statement of non-life and life insurance companies. To do so the researcher in particular focused on the information of dividend pay – out ratios leverage ratios and profitability ratios on sixteen (16) firms during the years 2013 – 2017 by employing correlation analysis. The results of the study found that the financial ratios with the same directions to dividend pay – out ratio but there were statistical insignificant included operating profitability ratio net profitability ratio return on assets ratio as well as return on equity ratio. On the other hand the financial ratio with contrary direction to dividend pay – out ratio but there was no statistical significant consisted of debt to equity ratio. However debt to total asset ratio was the one which was not only in the opposite direction to dividend pay – out ratio but also was statistical significant.

The objective of this research is to study the techniques of profit quality analysis and the consistency of the profit quality with different profit quality analysis techniques; and to compare profit sustainability between large companies and small companies of the industrial energy and utilities group and the petrochemical and chemical group. The data is collected from financial statements and data entry forms (Form 56-1) from 2012 to 2018. A total of 47 companies are analyzed using descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation; and inferential statistics including multiple regression analysis and analysis of the average difference between 2 groups The research found that in the analysis of the profit quality consistency in all 4 methods there were only 13 companies in the energy and utilities group with consistent quality of profits accounting for 39.39%; and 20 with inconsistent results accounting for 60.61%. In the petrochemical and chemical group there was only 1 company with consistent quality in all 4 methods representing 7.14%; and 13 companies with inconsistent quality representing 92.86%. In addition when comparing the profit sustainability between large companies and small companies it was found that there was no statistical difference in profit sustainability (sig = 0.305> 0.05). When comparing the profit sustainability between energy and utilities group and the petrochemical and chemical group it was found that petrochemical and chemical companies had a higher profit sustainability than the energy and utilities group at statistical significance of 0.01 (sig = 0.009 <0.01).

The objective of this research is to study the companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand Property and Construction Group on the relationship between corporate governance; namely the percentage of shares held by executives proportion of independent directors size of the board of directors management responsibilities of the chairman and the proportion of attendance at board meetings and 1) the operating result i.e. the return on total assets return on equity return on sales and earnings per share and 2) tax planning including the ratio of tax expenses to accounting profits before income tax and tax rate per total asset. The secondary data collected from the financial statements and the registration statement (Form 56-1) from year 2014 to 2018 in total of 71 companies is analyzed using descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics such as correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. The research results showed that corporate governance including the shareholding percentage held by management management responsibilities of the chairman and the proportion of attendance at the Board meetings has a positive relationship with tax planning (Tax rate to total assets) with statistical significance at the level of 0.01 and 0.05. There is also a positive relationship between the operating results including the return on total assets and tax planning (Tax rate to total assets) with statistical significance of 0.01.