This research aims to students toward the acitivites of the Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. And to compare the reviews of students on the activities of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The samplings for this study were the 386 students in Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. All 9 faculty. Accident Sampling The statistics were used namely; percentage mean and standard deviation (S.D) t-test and One-Way ANOVA. The statistical significant level of 0.05 and test on the differences with Seheffe method. The results were as follows : students toward the activities of the Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Found that overall comments to a large extent. When considering by aspects in arranging daily activities that benefit students. The mean maximum. And the implementation of student activities. The lowest average. Hypothesis testing to compare the reviews on the issues and events of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Found that students gender and the different. Had opinions toward condition and the activities of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. No difference. And Students at different grade. Had opinions toward activities and problems of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Different at significant level 0.05

A study on the motivation to participate in student development activities of the RMUTPs students was done with the objective to verify the level of the internal motivation (human relationship social service self - study for development and carrier path ) anf external motivations (location comfortable of travel a period of activites the content of activitiesinstructor and profit) and compare the differences of motivation rating scale base on personal factors : sexuallevel of studentfaculty GPA (grade point average) experience in participation and the information receiving. The study sample of 450 students was randomly selected from RMUTP. undergraduate students from 9 faculties.The data were collected by questionnaire (5 rating scales) and will be evaluated in frequency mean and standard deviation. T-test and one-way Anova used for comparing means at