This study was aimed to investigate problems and obstacles of 30 Royal Aide De Camp Department officers’ disbursement. The questionnaire was administered as the instrument for collecting data which were analyzed by the frequency distribution percentage distribution standard deviation t-test and One – Way ANOVA. In case of 0.05 statistical differences was found Least Significant Different method was applied to verify each pair. The results of the study revealed that most officers were males ranging between 31 to 40 years old and held bachelor’s degrees. They were responsible for the disbursement as administrative clerks with at least 15 years work experience. In terms of their opinions towards the disbursement they demonstrated in the average level. When examining each item the disbursement was still lack of notifying its processes such as paying reporting verifying informing since these are complicated orders. In addition payments were done through cash and checks; therefore executives or officers involving need to provide trainings or excursions in order to speed up the disbursement processes to obtain good understanding and problem solving skills to increase work efficiency and other necessary work experiences from other related work places.

This research is obviously studied the problems and obstacles in accepting the students for training according to the workplaces notions through the areas of training management training format training students qualifications and training students knowledge. The subjects for this research were randomly selected from varipus firms which accepted 115 third year undergraduated students in training. Questionnaires were statistically analyses by Percentage Mean and Standard Deviation. The findings of this research were as follow :1. In the training management aspect the workplaces were not able to cooperate with school for preparatory training and they did not know the major objectives of the training course syllabus moreover the firms did not have specific positions for training students. 2. Through the training format the observers who checked training students performances did not cooperate with the workplaces and the training students who themselves directly contacted to workplaces were not accepted. Furthermore there was no continuity of scattering training students on workplaces. 3. Training students qualifications training students were lack of mature selfconfidence and thoughtful ideas in working and solving problems. 4. Training students knowledge training students were not qualified in their vocational skillsEnglish and Thai communications task analyZing and task planning for their training job.