The article is aimed to study of outcome on student loan and study motive background (gender provinces amount of siblings parent education parent career family Measurement and method are studied from documents and questionnaire. The result show that student loan administration fix toohigh families income of students. 2) lack of the ckecklists in allocation. 3) lack to the payment back to student loan. 4) lack of the follow-up and evaluation The satisfaction of higher education students on student loan according to gender provinces amount of siblings parent career family income is not significantly different except parent education is significantly different at 0.01.

Objectives: The research purposes are as follows: To study the social and economic status of the loaned and unloaned student family; To compare the social and economic status personal and living status of the loaned and unloaned student; To study the problems and other difficu!ties of the staff involving the administration of the educational loan. To study the belief and social value of the loaned student toward the procedure of the educationa: loan. Procedures: The sample population is the student from Business Administration Faculty. The groups are separated into loaned unloaded group and opflration officers. The questionnaire is used as the data collection method. For the student groups the questionnaire has two different versions as follows: 280 copies for the loaned students; 263 copies for the unloaned students. The information from the four operation officers has collected through the interview process. The statistical analysis is using percentage mean standard deviation Tdistribution and Chi-square. Findings: The results are as follows: Economic and social status of the loaned students families and unloaned student are significantly different at 95% level. Personal and living status of the loaned student and unloaned student are significantly different at 95% level. In the loaned student opinion there is no problem or hindrance to the procedure of loangiving at faculty level. In genera! the procedure is fairly good (Mean= 3.35 s.d = 0.79). Basic social value is ranged from responsibility non-selfish and sacrifice respectively. In operation officers opinion the most important problem is that the loaned students do not come and contact on time.