The objectives of this institutional research were to study and to compare the expectation of students and officials to libraries’ services Institution of Academic Resource and Information Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon identifying by status by position the officials’ office and students’ faculties. The samples were teachers officials and undergraduate students of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon which registered on second semester of academic year 2008. The 680 samples were taken a random sample by stratification of samples’ groups. The data were collected by questionnaires which were five - level rating scale questions. The results were analyzed by percentage average value standard deviation and F-test. The results were as follows: 1. Students and officials had high level expectation to libraries’ services Institution of Academic Resource and Information Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. For consideration of each aspect students and officials had high level expectation to libraries’ services in every aspect the most average value was libraries’ services the next was libraries’ environments and information resources. 2. The questionnaires’ respondents who had different status by position had different expectation to libraries’ services with statistically significant level at .05. The teachers had more expectation to libraries’ services than the students. For consideration of each aspect the libraries’ environmental aspect was different with statistically significant level at .05. It showed that teachers and officials had more expectation to libraries’ services environmental aspect than the students. And for libraries’ services aspect it was different with statistically significant level at .05. It showed that teachers had more expectation to libraries’ services libraries’ services aspect than the students. 3. Officials of different offices had different expectation to libraries’ services with statistically significant level at .01. For consideration of each aspect It showed that every aspect was different with statistically significant level at .01. To compare of each couple it showed that no couples were different. 4. Students of different faculties had different expectation to libraries’ services with statistically significant level at .01. For consideration of each aspect It showed that the libraries’ environmental aspect was different with statistically significant level at .05 information resources aspect and libraries’ services aspect were different with statistically significant level at .01. The Faculty of Business Administration’s students had more expectation to libraries’ services aspect than the Faculty of Architecture and Design’s students. For other aspects no couples were different.

The purposes of this research were to study the canonical relationship between some factors and motivation on producing that relative contribute to academic papers and to study the canonical weights of some factory motivation on producing academic papers. The Sample were the 222 instructors in the office Rajamangala University of technology Phra Nakhon who work during the first semester of Academic year 2005. The stratified random sampling technique was used for selecting the sample. The instruments were the questionnaire considering the salary work load working experience Attitudes toward producing academic papers Self development Internal control Academic ability Motivation on advancement Motivation on recognition and Motivation on environment of producing academic papers. The findings were as follow: 1. The canonical correlation between Salary Work load Working experience Attitudes toward producing academic papers Self development Internal control Academic ability Motivation on advancement Motivation on recognition and Motivation on environment of producing academic papers were .510 .231 and .134 respectively. The first canonical function was Statistically Significant at .05 level. The second and third canonical function were Statistically nonsignificant. 2. The canonical weights for Attitudes toward producing academic papersself development and Internal Control relative contributed to Motivation on advancement Motivation on recognition and Motivation on environment of producing academic papers in the first canonical function.

This research aimed to study problems and needs of students and teachers in using registration website of Rajamangala University of Technology PhraNakhon based on genders age faculties and internet access experience. The samples were 400 undergraduate students and 233 teachers from Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The research tool was a questionnaire. Data collection was analyzed by SPSS (Statistics Package for Social Science) to find percentage mean and standard deviation (S.D.) T-test and f-test were used to find different problems and needs inusing registration website. The research findings were as follows;

The objectives of this lnstitutional research were an evaluation of using curriculums by studying and comparing opinion levels of students teachers and administrators inclusion in students’ satisfaction for educational process of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The 1415 samples of this study were 1259 students’ 134 teacher and 22 administrators from six faculties which are as follows faculty of lndustrial Textiles and Fashion Design’ faculty of Science and Technology faculty of Engineering faculty of lndustrial Education faculty of Home Economics Technology and faculty of Mass Communication Technology. The data were collected by questionnaires and grouping by the samples. The results of this study were analyzed by percentage average value and Likert scale.

The purposes of this research were to study the satisfaction of the inspected towards the internal audit and to compare the inspected satisfaction in each aspect according to sex age job position and experience. The sample participated in this research consisted of 200 of unit executives faculty secretaries division heads and operating officials who dealt with the process of the internal audit. The tool used to collect data was a questionnaire; the statistics used to analyze the data were percentage Arithmetic mean standard deviation t-test one-way ANOVA and Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used after significant difference was found between groups.