The purposes of this research were to study the canonical relationship between some factors and motivation on producing that relative contribute to academic papers and to study the canonical weights of some factory motivation on producing academic papers. The Sample were the 222 instructors in the office Rajamangala University of technology Phra Nakhon who work during the first semester of Academic year 2005. The stratified random sampling technique was used for selecting the sample. The instruments were the questionnaire considering the salary work load working experience Attitudes toward producing academic papers Self development Internal control Academic ability Motivation on advancement Motivation on recognition and Motivation on environment of producing academic papers. The findings were as follow: 1. The canonical correlation between Salary Work load Working experience Attitudes toward producing academic papers Self development Internal control Academic ability Motivation on advancement Motivation on recognition and Motivation on environment of producing academic papers were .510 .231 and .134 respectively. The first canonical function was Statistically Significant at .05 level. The second and third canonical function were Statistically nonsignificant. 2. The canonical weights for Attitudes toward producing academic papersself development and Internal Control relative contributed to Motivation on advancement Motivation on recognition and Motivation on environment of producing academic papers in the first canonical function.

This research aimed to study problems and needs of students and teachers in using registration website of Rajamangala University of Technology PhraNakhon based on genders age faculties and internet access experience. The samples were 400 undergraduate students and 233 teachers from Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The research tool was a questionnaire. Data collection was analyzed by SPSS (Statistics Package for Social Science) to find percentage mean and standard deviation (S.D.) T-test and f-test were used to find different problems and needs inusing registration website. The research findings were as follows;

The objectives of this lnstitutional research were an evaluation of using curriculums by studying and comparing opinion levels of students teachers and administrators inclusion in students’ satisfaction for educational process of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The 1415 samples of this study were 1259 students’ 134 teacher and 22 administrators from six faculties which are as follows faculty of lndustrial Textiles and Fashion Design’ faculty of Science and Technology faculty of Engineering faculty of lndustrial Education faculty of Home Economics Technology and faculty of Mass Communication Technology. The data were collected by questionnaires and grouping by the samples. The results of this study were analyzed by percentage average value and Likert scale.

The purposes of this research were to study the satisfaction of the inspected towards the internal audit and to compare the inspected satisfaction in each aspect according to sex age job position and experience. The sample participated in this research consisted of 200 of unit executives faculty secretaries division heads and operating officials who dealt with the process of the internal audit. The tool used to collect data was a questionnaire; the statistics used to analyze the data were percentage Arithmetic mean standard deviation t-test one-way ANOVA and Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used after significant difference was found between groups.

The purposes of this research were to build and develop a standardized test used to measure English abilities compliant with the curriculum of the fourth-year students of Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. There were two groups of the students namely the first group which consisted of 57 students who took the traditional pilot paper test and the latter which consisted of 63 students taking the electronic test via the Internet. The other purposes were to find out the students/users’ attitudes and satisfaction towards the use of the electronic test and to obtain a computer program prototype for measuring English abilities. The results were as follows: 1. The item analysis of the pilot paper test revealed that there were 64 items of appropriate difficulty index and discrimination power whereas that of the electronic test revealed that only 56 items had appropriate difficulty index and discrimination power. Even though the latter test had been improved the accepted items were fewer. This led to the assumption that the characteristics of doing an electronic test affected students’ decisions and made them guess more than when they took a paper test. 2. The questionnaires analysis of students’ satisfaction of using the electronic test program to measure their English abilities revealed that the overall arithmetic mean was 75.72. The highest scored item of 87.59 percent was “I think this e-test program is useful”; and the lowest scored item of 66.21 percent was “I think the screen format is interesting”. Moreover there were 11 users who showed their positive opinions towards the e-test program which was 18.97 percent of the latter group.